<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DoorQ.Com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doorq.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doorq.com</link>
	<description>The Gay SciFi, Fantasy, and Horror Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gaiman and &#039;Who&#039; win a Hugo by y</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2012/09/03/gamiman-and-who-win-a-hugo/#comment-7232</link>
		<dc:creator>y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8412#comment-7232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iam an author and my biggest dreams is winning this awards!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iam an author and my biggest dreams is winning this awards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Monster House&#8217; director to helm &#8216;Poltergeist&#8217; remake by Clerk</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/03/07/monster-house-director-to-helm-poltergeist-remake/#comment-7231</link>
		<dc:creator>Clerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=9084#comment-7231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poltergeist remake...why?  The original is as near perfect as a horror film gets. Aside from the son&#039;s freakishly bucked teeth, what are they going to improve? Are they going to improve the story? The acting? The effects? These remakes fail because they have nothing to add. Remake a crappy film into a better film. Remake a dated film with a good story but bad execution. Why remake films that were done right the first time? Why do people bother watching these remakes and proving to the studios they&#039;re profitable, then complain about them? Don&#039;t go and the remakes will stop!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poltergeist remake&#8230;why?  The original is as near perfect as a horror film gets. Aside from the son&#8217;s freakishly bucked teeth, what are they going to improve? Are they going to improve the story? The acting? The effects? These remakes fail because they have nothing to add. Remake a crappy film into a better film. Remake a dated film with a good story but bad execution. Why remake films that were done right the first time? Why do people bother watching these remakes and proving to the studios they&#8217;re profitable, then complain about them? Don&#8217;t go and the remakes will stop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rebooted &#8216;Tomb Raider&#8217; game is also looking for a big screen reboot as well by Sotos</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/03/05/rebooted-tomb-raider-game-is-also-looking-for-a-big-screen-reboot-as-well/#comment-7230</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=9073#comment-7230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indiana Jones is Harrison Ford. Mission Impossible without Tom Cruise wouldn’t be the same. Pirates of the Caribbean need Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow. Alien without Sigourney Weaver is Prometheus. Die Hard is Bruce Willis. Terminator is Arnold Schwarzenegger. Lara Croft IS Angelina Jolie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indiana Jones is Harrison Ford. Mission Impossible without Tom Cruise wouldn’t be the same. Pirates of the Caribbean need Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow. Alien without Sigourney Weaver is Prometheus. Die Hard is Bruce Willis. Terminator is Arnold Schwarzenegger. Lara Croft IS Angelina Jolie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Superman&#8217; controversy brewing at DC by spaced-odyssey</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/02/11/superman-controversy-brewing-at-dc/#comment-7229</link>
		<dc:creator>spaced-odyssey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8983#comment-7229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do believe I noted how pointless it is to boycott Man of Steel, just as much as pointless as signing a petition to have DC drop him -I&#039;ve never seen them to actually accomplish anything.

The consumer IS the ultimate decision maker here, however, and they&#039;ll either make Card&#039;s story successful or not. And that was my point at the end, all the other stuff was just information.

Have I used my influence as a long-time reader and bookseller to suggest to potential readers of Card&#039;s work to contemplate how damaging his views can, and do you they want to support that by purchasing his works?

Yes and no. It usually depended upon the audience. I can read body language fairly well, so I know when to speak up and when to be quiet.

Have many friends who once read his work and have no found out hateful he can be and stopped reading his stuff on their own?

Yes.

Can I influence anyone into not buying his novels or this Superman story or stop people from seeing Man of Steel or Ender&#039;s Game when it comes out in November?

No. I&#039;m just some dude trying to put information out there. Is it tinged with opinion? Of course. Blogs usually are, even this one.

I was brought up to question everything, never take things at face value and beware of hypocrites (which all of are, by the way). Orson Scott Card, by expressing his opinion, is by the de facto nature then, an activist for that opinion.

And so must I be.

In the end, I&#039;m disappointed the DC has hired him, but in a free country, they&#039;re able to do that. But on the flip-side, I&#039;m also able to point out my feelings on his hiring as well, and offer solutions to people who disagree with Card&#039;s opinion.

Oh to wish I could, though. Then I could stop people from reading James Patterson books and seeing Tom Cruise films.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe I noted how pointless it is to boycott Man of Steel, just as much as pointless as signing a petition to have DC drop him -I&#8217;ve never seen them to actually accomplish anything.</p>
<p>The consumer IS the ultimate decision maker here, however, and they&#8217;ll either make Card&#8217;s story successful or not. And that was my point at the end, all the other stuff was just information.</p>
<p>Have I used my influence as a long-time reader and bookseller to suggest to potential readers of Card&#8217;s work to contemplate how damaging his views can, and do you they want to support that by purchasing his works?</p>
<p>Yes and no. It usually depended upon the audience. I can read body language fairly well, so I know when to speak up and when to be quiet.</p>
<p>Have many friends who once read his work and have no found out hateful he can be and stopped reading his stuff on their own?</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p>Can I influence anyone into not buying his novels or this Superman story or stop people from seeing Man of Steel or Ender&#8217;s Game when it comes out in November?</p>
<p>No. I&#8217;m just some dude trying to put information out there. Is it tinged with opinion? Of course. Blogs usually are, even this one.</p>
<p>I was brought up to question everything, never take things at face value and beware of hypocrites (which all of are, by the way). Orson Scott Card, by expressing his opinion, is by the de facto nature then, an activist for that opinion.</p>
<p>And so must I be.</p>
<p>In the end, I&#8217;m disappointed the DC has hired him, but in a free country, they&#8217;re able to do that. But on the flip-side, I&#8217;m also able to point out my feelings on his hiring as well, and offer solutions to people who disagree with Card&#8217;s opinion.</p>
<p>Oh to wish I could, though. Then I could stop people from reading James Patterson books and seeing Tom Cruise films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Superman&#8217; controversy brewing at DC by SH</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/02/11/superman-controversy-brewing-at-dc/#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>SH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8983#comment-7228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, first of all, anyone has a right to work, so even the freakyminded ones like mr Card.
But..., that said..., having read all of what he says, isn&#039;t it obvious he is a selftormented closethomosexual himself? And with all that talk of pedophilia..., I&#039;m even guessing that&#039;s one of his problems to!
It&#039;s his way of fighting the feelings he has himself. The way the Mormons teach themselves to fight it. By just hating and hating and hating. But the more disgusting hate you spew, the more obvious it is to the rest, that he has to be one himself.

So, going back to the books. If they&#039;re good, read them. If they&#039;re bad, don&#039;t read them!
His sick thoughts shouldn&#039;t have anything to do with his creativity.
Now what should be said about mr Card is..., having asked for anything that compares to the ridiculousness of gay marriage..., well that would be religion.
Now I&#039;m not saying that gay marriage is ridiculous. But I am saying that religion is! So he believes in something ridiculous and spurts out hate for something that&#039;s quite logical. So who&#039;s the idiot?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, first of all, anyone has a right to work, so even the freakyminded ones like mr Card.<br />
But&#8230;, that said&#8230;, having read all of what he says, isn&#8217;t it obvious he is a selftormented closethomosexual himself? And with all that talk of pedophilia&#8230;, I&#8217;m even guessing that&#8217;s one of his problems to!<br />
It&#8217;s his way of fighting the feelings he has himself. The way the Mormons teach themselves to fight it. By just hating and hating and hating. But the more disgusting hate you spew, the more obvious it is to the rest, that he has to be one himself.</p>
<p>So, going back to the books. If they&#8217;re good, read them. If they&#8217;re bad, don&#8217;t read them!<br />
His sick thoughts shouldn&#8217;t have anything to do with his creativity.<br />
Now what should be said about mr Card is&#8230;, having asked for anything that compares to the ridiculousness of gay marriage&#8230;, well that would be religion.<br />
Now I&#8217;m not saying that gay marriage is ridiculous. But I am saying that religion is! So he believes in something ridiculous and spurts out hate for something that&#8217;s quite logical. So who&#8217;s the idiot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Superman&#8217; controversy brewing at DC by Hav</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/02/11/superman-controversy-brewing-at-dc/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>Hav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8983#comment-7227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t want to support Card for his beliefs, you should definitely boycott his Superman story. Boycotting the entire comic line, however, is stupid, and boycotting Man of Steel, something Card has literally nothing to do with, is probably the most ignorant idea I&#039;ve heard in a while. Some joe-schmoe has hired a delusional douchebag to write a one off story in a comic line, and you want to harm the work of people completely unrelated to him because the property is the same? Come on. Even you have to admit that&#039;s pretty nonsensical.

Even if people listened to you, and Man of Steel was boycotted in massive quantities by people all over the world, and became a box off failure of epic proportions, Warner Brothers would think Zack Snyder was a shitty director and they shouldn&#039;t have picked him. Or maybe Superman was miscast. Or any number of other things that are ACTUALLY RELATED to the product itself, than Card writing a one off story in a Superman comic book. Jesus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t want to support Card for his beliefs, you should definitely boycott his Superman story. Boycotting the entire comic line, however, is stupid, and boycotting Man of Steel, something Card has literally nothing to do with, is probably the most ignorant idea I&#8217;ve heard in a while. Some joe-schmoe has hired a delusional douchebag to write a one off story in a comic line, and you want to harm the work of people completely unrelated to him because the property is the same? Come on. Even you have to admit that&#8217;s pretty nonsensical.</p>
<p>Even if people listened to you, and Man of Steel was boycotted in massive quantities by people all over the world, and became a box off failure of epic proportions, Warner Brothers would think Zack Snyder was a shitty director and they shouldn&#8217;t have picked him. Or maybe Superman was miscast. Or any number of other things that are ACTUALLY RELATED to the product itself, than Card writing a one off story in a Superman comic book. Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Superman&#8217; controversy brewing at DC by Austin</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/02/11/superman-controversy-brewing-at-dc/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8983#comment-7226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really unfortunate. The level of intolerance for other people&#039;s views kind of makes me sick. Of course I&#039;m talking about the author of this article. Drawing comparisons to the holocaust or civil rights because someone has a belief in morality is intellectually bankrupt.  The fact that you can only hurl insults and use playground insults like &quot;homophobe&quot; means you are not being intellectually honest about the discussion and are probably too close minded to understand how someone can be against homosexuality and NOT be hateful.

I, among many others, find it a great example of classic Superman morality to have someone of this caliber making comics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really unfortunate. The level of intolerance for other people&#8217;s views kind of makes me sick. Of course I&#8217;m talking about the author of this article. Drawing comparisons to the holocaust or civil rights because someone has a belief in morality is intellectually bankrupt.  The fact that you can only hurl insults and use playground insults like &#8220;homophobe&#8221; means you are not being intellectually honest about the discussion and are probably too close minded to understand how someone can be against homosexuality and NOT be hateful.</p>
<p>I, among many others, find it a great example of classic Superman morality to have someone of this caliber making comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Superman&#8217; controversy brewing at DC by Scott</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/02/11/superman-controversy-brewing-at-dc/#comment-7225</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8983#comment-7225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off you&#039;re some sort of bigot your self sir!
 Who cares that he is anti-gay! So long as he doesn&#039;t bring those sentiments into the comic he&#039;s writing? I could give two craps so long as the story and writing is good! People really need to let go of stuff I&#039;m sorry but things are being made WAY too damn complicated. He doesn&#039;t like gay marriage? So what neither does most of America and is as sick of hearing about it as I am! Let the man be for Christ Sakes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off you&#8217;re some sort of bigot your self sir!<br />
 Who cares that he is anti-gay! So long as he doesn&#8217;t bring those sentiments into the comic he&#8217;s writing? I could give two craps so long as the story and writing is good! People really need to let go of stuff I&#8217;m sorry but things are being made WAY too damn complicated. He doesn&#8217;t like gay marriage? So what neither does most of America and is as sick of hearing about it as I am! Let the man be for Christ Sakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott to produce &#8216;Mind MGMT&#8217;; Smulders on &#8216;S.H.I.E.L.D.?&#8217;; more &#8216;X-Men&#8217; return; and history of &#8216;Doctor Who&#8217; film is cast by nathan</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/01/30/scott-to-produce-mind-mgmt-smulders-on-s-h-e-i-l-d-more-x-men-return-and-history-of-doctor-who-film-is-cast/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8934#comment-7224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannibal Lecter was in the X Men series? Huh! I don&#039;t remember that.  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hannibal Lecter was in the X Men series? Huh! I don&#8217;t remember that.  <img src='http://doorq.com/doorq/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BREAKING NEWS: J.J. Abrams to helm &#8216;Star Wars: Episode VII&#8217; by Jack</title>
		<link>http://doorq.com/2013/01/24/breaking-news-j-j-abrams-to-helm-star-wars-episode-vii/#comment-7223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doorq.com/?p=8916#comment-7223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JJ Abrams?
This sucks..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ Abrams?<br />
This sucks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
